Envoy includes an HTTP router filter which can be installed to perform advanced routing tasks. This is useful both for handling edge traffic (traditional reverse proxy request handling) as well as for building a service to service Envoy mesh (typically via routing on the host/authority HTTP header to reach a particular upstream service cluster). Envoy also has the ability to be configured as forward proxy. In the forward proxy configuration, mesh clients can participate by appropriately configuring their http proxy to be an Envoy. At a high level the router takes an incoming HTTP request, matches it to an upstream cluster, acquires a connection pool to a host in the upstream cluster, and forwards the request. The router filter supports the following features:
Virtual hosts that map domains/authorities to a set of routing rules.
Prefix and exact path matching rules (both case sensitive and case insensitive). Regex/slug matching is not currently supported, mainly because it makes it difficult/impossible to programmatically determine whether routing rules conflict with each other. For this reason we don’t recommend regex/slug routing at the reverse proxy level, however we may add support in the future depending on demand.
TLS redirection at the virtual host level.
Direct (non-proxied) HTTP responses at the route level.
Automatic host rewriting based on the DNS name of the selected upstream host.
Request retries specified either via HTTP header or via route configuration.
Request hedging for retries in response to a request (per try) timeout.
Arbitrary header matching routing rules.
Virtual cluster specifications. A virtual cluster is specified at the virtual host level and is used by Envoy to generate additional statistics on top of the standard cluster level ones. Virtual clusters can use regex matching.
Priority based routing.
Hash policy based routing.
Absolute urls are supported for non-tls forward proxies.
Scoped routing enables Envoy to put constraints on search space of domains and route rules. A Route Scope associates a key with a route table. For each request, a scope key is computed dynamically by the HTTP connection manager to pick the route table. RouteConfiguration associated with scope can be loaded on demand with v3 API reference configured and on demand filed in protobuf set to true.
The Scoped RDS (SRDS) API contains a set of Scopes resources, each defining independent routing configuration, along with a ScopeKeyBuilder defining the key construction algorithm used by Envoy to look up the scope corresponding to each request.
For example, for the following scoped route configuration, Envoy will look into the “addr” header value, split the header value by “;” first, and use the first value for key ‘x-foo-key’ as the scope key. If the “addr” header value is “foo=1;x-foo-key=127.0.0.1;x-bar-key=18.104.22.168”, then “127.0.0.1” will be computed as the scope key to look up for corresponding route configuration.
name: scope_by_addr fragments: - header_value_extractor: name: Addr element_separator: ; element: key: x-foo-key separator: =
For a key to match a ScopedRouteConfiguration, the number of fragments in the computed key has to match that of the ScopedRouteConfiguration. Then fragments are matched in order. A missing fragment(treated as NULL) in the built key makes the request unable to match any scope, i.e. no route entry can be found for the request.
The configuration for the HTTP connection manager owns the route table that is used by all configured HTTP filters. Although the router filter is the primary consumer of the route table, other filters also have access in case they want to make decisions based on the ultimate destination of the request. For example, the built in rate limit filter consults the route table to determine whether the global rate limit service should be called based on the route. The connection manager makes sure that all calls to acquire a route are stable for a particular request, even if the decision involves randomness (e.g. in the case of a runtime configuration route rule).
Maximum number of retries: Envoy will continue to retry any number of times. The intervals between retries are decided either by an exponential backoff algorithm (the default), or based on feedback from the upstream server via headers (if present). Additionally, all retries are contained within the overall request timeout. This avoids long request times due to a large number of retries.
Retry conditions: Envoy can retry on different types of conditions depending on application requirements. For example, network failure, all 5xx response codes, idempotent 4xx response codes, etc.
Retry budgets: Envoy can limit the proportion of active requests via retry budgets that can be retries to prevent their contribution to large increases in traffic volume.
Host selection retry plugins: Envoy can be configured to apply additional logic to the host selection logic when selecting hosts for retries. Specifying a retry host predicate allows for reattempting host selection when certain hosts are selected (e.g. when an already attempted host is selected), while a retry priority can be configured to adjust the priority load used when selecting a priority for retries.
Note that Envoy retries requests when x-envoy-overloaded is present. It is recommended to either configure retry budgets (preferred) or set maximum active retries circuit breaker to an appropriate value to avoid retry storms.
Envoy supports request hedging which can be enabled by specifying a hedge policy. This means that Envoy will race multiple simultaneous upstream requests and return the response associated with the first acceptable response headers to the downstream. The retry policy is used to determine whether a response should be returned or whether more responses should be awaited.
Currently hedging can only be performed in response to a request timeout. This means that a retry request will be issued without canceling the initial timed-out request and a late response will be awaited. The first “good” response according to retry policy will be returned downstream.
The implementation ensures that the same upstream request is not retried twice. This might otherwise occur if a request times out and then results in a 5xx response, creating two retriable events.
Envoy supports priority routing at the route level. The current priority implementation uses different connection pool and circuit breaking settings for each priority level. This means that even for HTTP/2 requests, two physical connections will be used to an upstream host. In the future Envoy will likely support true HTTP/2 priority over a single connection.
The currently supported priorities are default and high.
Envoy supports the sending of “direct” responses. These are preconfigured HTTP responses that do not require proxying to an upstream server.
There are two ways to specify a direct response in a Route:
Set the direct_response field. This works for all HTTP response statuses.
Set the redirect field. This works for redirect response statuses only, but it simplifies the setting of the Location header.
A direct response has an HTTP status code and an optional body. The Route configuration can specify the response body inline or specify the pathname of a file containing the body. If the Route configuration specifies a file pathname, Envoy will read the file upon configuration load and cache the contents.
If a response body is specified, it must be no more than 4KB in size, regardless of whether it is provided inline or in a file. Envoy currently holds the entirety of the body in memory, so the 4KB limit is intended to keep the proxy’s memory footprint from growing too large.
If response_headers_to_add has been set for the Route or the enclosing Virtual Host, Envoy will include the specified headers in the direct HTTP response.